December 20th, 2013 International Human Solidarity Day December 21st, 2013 December Solstice December 24th, 2013 Christmas Eve December 25th, 2013 Christmas Day December 26th, 2013 Kwanzaa December 31st, 2013 New Year's Eve January 1st, 2014 New Year's Day January 6th, 2014 Epiphany January 7th, 2014 Orthodox Christmas Day January 13th, 2014 Stephen Foster Memorial Day January 14th, 2014 Orthodox New Year January 14th, 2014 Prophet's Birthday January 16th, 2014 Tu B'Shevat January 17th, 2014 Lee Jackson Day January 19th, 2014 Robert E Lee's Birthday January 19th, 2014 Confederate Memorial Day January 20th, 2014 Civil Rights Day January 20th, 2014 Idaho Human Rights Day January 20th, 2014 Robert E Lee's Birthday January 20th, 2014 Martin Luther King Day
Woodrow Wilson Letter-marshall Foch-militarist, Imperialist & Obstacle To Peace For Sale
(1856-1924)28th president of the
United States (March 4th, 1913 - March 4th, 1921)
Woodrow Wilson Letter Signed Regarding Marshall Foch, Supreme Commander of the
Allied Forces in WWI -- "…I was entirely disillusioned about [Foch] while
I was in France…he is the leader of the militaristic and imperialistic elements
in France…they are the worst enemies of the peace of the world…"
important typed letter signed by Woodrow Wilson, shortly after he left office,
regarding the World War I Supreme Allied Commander, Marshall Ferdinand Foch.
Wilson gives his forthright, unfavorable opinion about Foch, which is striking
as Foch was widely considered a most able and effective commander responsible
for winning World War I.
Dated 25 April
1921 upon Wilson's personal stationery, letter reads in full:
I do not think
it would be wise for me to comment on your suggestion regarding Marshall Foch,
because I was entirely disillusioned about him while I was in France. He proved
himself in the Peace negotiations the most difficult obstacle to a peaceful
Some day I hope
I may in conversation give you full information to what I refer. Suffice it to
say for the present that he is the leader of the militaristic and imperialistic
elements in France which are bent upon reversing the Alsace-Lorraine business
in the Ruhr District. For the moment they are the worst enemies of the peace of
could not receive Marshall Foch. With kindest regards and regret I cannot help
out in this matter;
The letter is
accompanied by a return reply from Holt to Wilson thanking him for writing
"so frankly…what you say is an entirely new point of view to me."
Holt had written Wilson for comments upon Holt's favorable editorial of Foch,
which had been published in "The Independent." In this editorial,
Holt went so far in his praise of Foch to suggest that the United States grant
him a tract of land as she had done for French General Lafayette after the
this offering includes a letter from Holt, dated March 23rd, 1931,
to a Mrs. Johnson, referencing Wilson's letter, explaining that "When
Marshall Foch visited Washington, he called on Wilson, but he was not received.
The papers said the next morning it was because Wilson was too ill. Wilson's
letter, however, gives undoubtedly the real reason."
letters in very good condition; Wilson's single page letter measures 7" x
9.5", with some creasing and minute foxing. Wilson's full signature is
bold and clear. A fascinating letter by President Wilson, providing new insight
into post WWI European and American tension, which would inextricably build to
the breaking point of World War II less than twenty years later.
Note 1 - World War I
background of Marshal Foch and sources of
Woodrow Wilson’s antipathy -
In 1914 Ferdinand Foch (1851-1929) checked the invading
German troops as they fanned across French territory. A brilliant tactician, he
was largely responsible for General Joffre's crucial victory at the Marne and
in 1918 he became commander of the allied armies on the Western front. His
strategic and well-planned attacks led to the German army's withdrawal and the
November 11, 1918 armistice that ended hostilities. He made important
contributions to the armistice negotiations and the Paris Peace Conference that
However, during the peace negotiations, the French would
not relent in their age-long hatred of the Germans. At the same time, their
dislike of Wilson increased dramatically. Foch was a leading advocate, with
other French military officers, for a Rhine frontier that would insure peace.
Because Wilson delayed offering the so-called reinsurance treaty with France to
the U. S. Senate until he could get some assurance that the main treaty would
be favourably acted upon, French leaders complained that the Anglo-Saxons, who
had saved them, were jockeying them. Nor was it merely the work of disappointed
statesmen. Foch did not stand
alone in his denunciation of Wilson. The
French elections of November, 1919, resulted in an overwhelming victory
for the reactionaries, but when the Chambers proceeded to choose the next
President they defeated Clemenceau largely on the ground that he had yielded
too much to Wilson.
Note 2 - Holt editorial
for The Independent –
In his editorial Holt
acknowledged Foch's importance to the allied victory observing that he had been
the de facto commander-in-chief of the U.S. armies in France during World War I
and compared him to the French general and American Revolutionary War hero
Marquis de Lafayette.
After sending proofs of the
editorial for comment, Holt received letters from both Taft and Wilson, the two
ex-presidents still alive at the time. The latter deeply disliked Foch for his
perceived intransigence during the negotiations that lead to the final peace
treaty. Taft's letter, in which he compares Foch to American general and
president Ulysses S. Grant, was printed in The Independent along with the editorial.
Note 3 – Text for an
associated letter written by William H. Taft, the 27th President,
regarding Marshal Foch –
This typed letter signed
("Wm. H. Taft"), with holograph corrections, is datelined “New Haven,
April 25, 1921,” written on Taft’s
personal stationery to newspaper editor Hamilton Holt (1872-1951).
"My dear Mr. Editor:
The case of Marshall Foch is an exceptional one in the
history of this country, and needs, therefore, exceptional treatment. He was in
supreme command of the forces of the world, engaged in struggling to save the
world from domination of militarism. He, therefore, commanded our army, of more
than a million men, in the greatest war in history, and a war the like of which
we are all struggling to make impossible hereafter. We may all admit that
Marshall Foch was the great strategical genius of the war, and that he was
able. to carry to successful demonstration the principles he had so lucidly set
forth in his lectures on Military Science. When General Grant was dying at Mt. McGregor,
and the heart of the whole country was throbbing with gratitude for what he had
done in leading the army of the Republic to victory in our Civil War, and in
saving the country whole, Congress enacted a law authorizing the President to
appoint, and the Senate to confirm, as General of the Army on the retired list,
at a salary of $12,000, a General who had commanded an army in the Civil War.
President Arthur at once nominated General Grant, and the Senate at once
confirmed the nomination; and this gracious and grateful demonstration of the
feeling of the country toward him cheered the dying days of the national hero.
It seems to me that using this precedent, with appropriate variations, the
people of this country, through Congress and the President, may evidence to
Marshall Foch, and to the people of France, our deep appreciation of the great
services of this son of France to us and to the World.
Research reference: Register – Hamilton Holt Papers, processed by Peter
E. Robinson, Mills Memorial Library, Rollins College, Winter Park, Florida, 1964,
These letters are mentioned
in Box 2 (Correspondence 1918-1922 - Letters pertaining to Marshall Foch's
visit to U.S., Wilson's criticism of Foch)
Rupp Brothers'buy-it-nowprice to acquire 1921 Woodrow Wilson letteris $7,950 Rupp Brothers, as a courtesy to all buyers, pays ALL shipping and insurance costs.New York State residents- please add the appropriate sales tax for the NY county where delivery will be made. If you have questions about this Woodrow Wilsonletter, please email or telephone Christopher Rupp. Christopher's office telephone number is (516) 364-3701The email address is "ruppbrothers (at) mindspring.com"Every inquiry will receive a prompt and candid reply.Thank you for reviewing Rupp Brothers' offerings. The interest is appreciated. Rupp Brothers was established in 1975 - this is our 38th year in business as professional dealers
Brothers is actively buying exceptional-quality American autographed letters
and historic documents -
you selling exceptional quality autographed letters and documents? If yes,
please telephone Christopher Rupp at (516) 364-3701. You will receive
straight-forward answers to all your questions. If you e-mail Christopher
scanned images of the letters and/or documents that you are selling, you will
receive a courteous and candid reply within 48 hours.
Rupp Brothers is particularly keen to acquire American historic letters concerning
the following subjects - Colonial America, the Founding Fathers, Antebellum
national politics, Westward Expansion, the Civil War, early industrialization
and the Second World War. If you are selling letters with substantive content, Rupp Brothers buying prices are very strong.
This item has been shown 111 times.
Woodrow Wilson Letter-marshall Foch-militarist, Imperialist & Obstacle To Peace: $7,950