Reviews
Steve Woodworth, perhaps the most prolific and versatile Civil War historian working today, has taken on a big subject "the entire war. His This Great Struggle is a smoothly written, highly readable and insightful retelling of the full story, full of twists of cogent insight that make it a different, much welcomed synthesis of that brutal passage in our history. Hitting all the necessary stops, he has crafted a masterful tapestry., Woodworth, of Texas Christian University, enhances his position in the front rank of Civil War scholars. He makes a strong case for three controversial points. First, the Civil War was about slavery. The fundamental dispute over the 'peculiar institution' had continually defied peaceful resolution; state's rights, tariffs, all the other wedge issues were structured by slavery; and from the war's beginning both sides knew why they were really fighting. Second, Woodworth establishes the war's crucial sector as between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River. The eastern theater rapidly stalemated; only in the west was there space to sustain the large-scale maneuver war that gave full scope to the Union's industrial superiority and to developed generals like Grant and Sherman. Third, Woodworth demonstrates that while the Union's conventional victory was 'clear and overwhelming,' Reconstruction was an unconventional phase of the war-'not quite open war but not quite peace'-in which the advantage rested with the vanquished South. A desperate commitment to sustaining white supremacy outlasted the North's will to complete the transformation of American society. This is a well-crafted, comprehensively researched overview of America's central conflict., Well written and engaging, This Great Struggle is a superb introduction to the event that forged modern America., Praise for Steven Woodworth's Davis and Lee at War: "Well written and highly illuminating . . . not only an incisive study of military command but a penetrating psychological analysis of Davis, Lee, and other key figures of the Confederacy.", Steven Woodworth offers a distillation of current scholarship in readable form which can easily be grasped by readers coming to the subject for the first time. In exploring the nature of the war and its overall significance, he at once dismisses the notion that the war was a 'futile' waste, an accusation that echoes the language of British critics of the Western Front 191418 and reflects vastly different perspectives from the pre-Vietnam triumphalism of 196165. The Civil War 'was worth fighting', Woodworth declares forthrightly. More than that, it is 'worth studying because of what was at stake ... because of how the war changed America' and because 'of the height to which that generation of Americans rose and its challenge to future generations to be worthy of a free government' (p. xiii). This passage reveals the influence of the popular notion which holds that specific generations evince a particular moral character., [Woodworth] shows clearly how the war in the West--Grant's and Sherman's war--was the decisive factor, rather than the stalemate in the East. He also demonstrates how the South's unrelenting campaign to maintain white supremacy--the felicitous phrase is 'not quite open war, but not quite peace'--outlasted a tired North's determination to fully end the realities of slavery., Praise for Steven Woodworth's Nothing but Victory: The Army of the Tennessee, 1861-1865: "Truly impressive. . . . Woodworth has described with clarity and vigor the tactical actions in such battles as Shiloh, Champion Hill and Atlanta.", Woodworth, of Texas Christian University, enhances his position in the front rank of Civil War scholars. He makes a strong case for three controversial points. First, the Civil War was about slavery. The fundamental dispute over the 'peculiar institution' had continually defied peaceful resolution; state's rights, tariffs, all the other wedge issues were structured by slavery; and from the war's beginning both sides knew why they were really fighting. Second, Woodworth establishes the war's crucial sector as between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River. The eastern theater rapidly stalemated; only in the west was there space to sustain the large-scale maneuver war that gave full scope to the Union's industrial superiority and to developed generals like Grant and Sherman. Third, Woodworth demonstrates that while the Union's conventional victory was 'clear and overwhelming,' Reconstruction was an unconventional phase of the war--'not quite open war but not quite peace'--in which the advantage rested with the vanquished South. A desperate commitment to sustaining white supremacy outlasted the North's will to complete the transformation of American society. This is a well-crafted, comprehensively researched overview of America's central conflict., [Woodworth] shows clearly how the war in the West-Grant's and Sherman's war-was the decisive factor, rather than the stalemate in the East. He also demonstrates how the South's unrelenting campaign to maintain white supremacy-the felicitous phrase is 'not quite open war, but not quite peace'-outlasted a tired North's determination to fully end the realities of slavery., Steve Woodworth, perhaps the most prolific and versatile Civil War historian working today, has taken on a big subject--the entire war. His This Great Struggle is a smoothly written, highly readable and insightful retelling of the full story, full of twists of cogent insight that make it a different, much welcomed synthesis of that brutal passage in our history. Hitting all the necessary stops, he has crafted a masterful tapestry., Woodworth, of Texas Christian University, enhances his position in the front rank of Civil War scholars. He makes a strong case for three controversial points. First, the Civil War was about slavery. The fundamental dispute over the 'peculiar institution' had continually defied peaceful resolution; statee(tm)s rights, tariffs, all the other wedge issues were structured by slavery; and from the ware(tm)s beginning both sides knew why they were really fighting. Second, Woodworth establishes the ware(tm)s crucial sector as between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River. The eastern theater rapidly stalemated; only in the west was there space to sustain the large-scale maneuver war that gave full scope to the Unione(tm)s industrial superiority and to developed generals like Grant and Sherman. Third, Woodworth demonstrates that while the Unione(tm)s conventional victory was 'clear and overwhelming,' Reconstruction was an unconventional phase of the ware"'not quite open war but not quite peace'e"in which the advantage rested with the vanquished South. A desperate commitment to sustaining white supremacy outlasted the Northe(tm)s will to complete the transformation of American society. This is a well-crafted, comprehensively researched overview of Americae(tm)s central conflict., A compact yet comprehensive text that will satisfy both the military history enthusiast and the social historian. [Woodworth's] deft handling of the campaigns and eminently readable prose will appeal to any senior level history student., Woodworth, author of, most recently, Manifest Destinies (2010), recounts the entire Civil War surveystyle, from causes to aftermath. Necessarily presenting matters at a high level of generality, he introduces major events and historianse(tm) debates to his intended audience of readers newly acquainting themselves with the conflict, who may be surprised that positing slavery as the fundamental cause of the war is occasionally disputed by scholars who magnify the tariff or statese(tm) rights. Militarily, the Battle of Gettysburg lodges in the popular mind as the ware(tm)s most decisive. Woodworth dispatches such misconceptions en route to summarizing the major campaigns of the war (those in Mississippi, Tennessee, and Georgia were the critical ones), as well as maintaining front and center the ware(tm)s ever-present political contexts in the North and the South. Still, it is the battlefield drama and the qualities of commanders that fascinate buffs, whose expectations Woodworth cultivates with his precise delineation of military action and lapidary portraits of generals directing it well or badly in this fine gateway to the vast Civil War bibliography., Woodworth, of Texas Christian University, enhances his position in the front rank of Civil War scholars. He makes a strong case for three controversial points. First, the Civil War was about slavery. The fundamental dispute over the 'peculiar institution' had continually defied peaceful resolution; state "s rights, tariffs, all the other wedge issues were structured by slavery; and from the war "s beginning both sides knew why they were really fighting. Second, Woodworth establishes the war "s crucial sector as between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River. The eastern theater rapidly stalemated; only in the west was there space to sustain the large-scale maneuver war that gave full scope to the Union "s industrial superiority and to developed generals like Grant and Sherman. Third, Woodworth demonstrates that while the Union "s conventional victory was 'clear and overwhelming,' Reconstruction was an unconventional phase of the war "'not quite open war but not quite peace' "in which the advantage rested with the vanquished South. A desperate commitment to sustaining white supremacy outlasted the North "s will to complete the transformation of American society. This is a well-crafted, comprehensively researched overview of America "s central conflict., Woodworth, author of, most recently, Manifest Destinies (2010), recounts the entire Civil War surveystyle, from causes to aftermath. Necessarily presenting matters at a high level of generality, he introduces major events and historians' debates to his intended audience of readers newly acquainting themselves with the conflict, who may be surprised that positing slavery as the fundamental cause of the war is occasionally disputed by scholars who magnify the tariff or states' rights. Militarily, the Battle of Gettysburg lodges in the popular mind as the war's most decisive. Woodworth dispatches such misconceptions en route to summarizing the major campaigns of the war (those in Mississippi, Tennessee, and Georgia were the critical ones), as well as maintaining front and center the war's ever-present political contexts in the North and the South. Still, it is the battlefield drama and the qualities of commanders that fascinate buffs, whose expectations Woodworth cultivates with his precise delineation of military action and lapidary portraits of generals directing it well or badly in this fine gateway to the vast Civil War bibliography., [Woodworth] shows clearly how the war in the Weste"Grante(tm)s and Shermane(tm)s ware"was the decisive factor, rather than the stalemate in the East. He also demonstrates how the Southe(tm)s unrelenting campaign to maintain white supremacye"the felicitous phrase is 'not quite open war, but not quite peace'e"outlasted a tired Northe(tm)s determination to fully end the realities of slavery., Woodworth, author of, most recently, Manifest Destinies (2010), recounts the entire Civil War surveystyle, from causes to aftermath. Necessarily presenting matters at a high level of generality, he introduces major events and historians " debates to his intended audience of readers newly acquainting themselves with the conflict, who may be surprised that positing slavery as the fundamental cause of the war is occasionally disputed by scholars who magnify the tariff or states " rights. Militarily, the Battle of Gettysburg lodges in the popular mind as the war "s most decisive. Woodworth dispatches such misconceptions en route to summarizing the major campaigns of the war (those in Mississippi, Tennessee, and Georgia were the critical ones), as well as maintaining front and center the war "s ever-present political contexts in the North and the South. Still, it is the battlefield drama and the qualities of commanders that fascinate buffs, whose expectations Woodworth cultivates with his precise delineation of military action and lapidary portraits of generals directing it well or badly in this fine gateway to the vast Civil War bibliography., Woodworth, (Texas Christian Univ.) has authored several respected books on Civil War subjects (e.g., Davis and Lee at War, CH, May'96, 33-5327; Nothing but Victory: The Army of the Tennessee, CH, Jun'06, 43-6118). This broader work covering the entire war--based on solid research, thoughtful analysis, and readable prose--clearly describes military tactics. Woodworth understands the need to address its complexities, but in some places, a map would have helped. Frequently, his interpretations enliven his account. For example, he argues the importance of the Union victory at Fort Henry in early 1862 because "the Confederacy never really recovered from it," and insists that Gettysburg in 1863 was not "the great decisive battle and turning point of the war." The author provides useful details about leaders--he admires Grant's ability--and about armies. He makes thoughtful comparisons, including Grant at Vicksburg with General Joseph Hooker at Chancellorsville, or the reasons for Northern and Southern optimism in the spring of 1864. As a professor, Woodworth has learned the need to explain such vague terms as "political generals." This solid history is a useful guide for general readers and experts studying the Civil War during its 150th anniversary. Recommended. All levels/libraries., Steve Woodworth, perhaps the most prolific and versatile Civil War historian working today, has taken on a big subjecte"the entire war. His This Great Struggle is a smoothly written, highly readable and insightful retelling of the full story, full of twists of cogent insight that make it a different, much welcomed synthesis of that brutal passage in our history. Hitting all the necessary stops, he has crafted a masterful tapestry., Woodworth, (Texas Christian Univ.) has authored several respected books on Civil War subjects (e.g., Davis and Lee at War, CH, May'96, 33-5327; Nothing but Victory: The Army of the Tennessee, CH, Jun'06, 43-6118). This broader work covering the entire war--based on solid research, thoughtful analysis, and readable prose--clearly describes military tactics. Woodworth understands the need to address its complexities, but in some places, a map would have helped. Frequently, his interpretations enliven his account. For example, he argues the importance of the Union victory at Fort Henry in early 1862 because "the Confederacy never really recovered from it," and insists that Gettysburg in 1863 was not "the great decisive battle and turning point of the war." The author provides useful details about leaders--he admires Grant's ability--and about armies. He makes thoughtful comparisons, including Grant at Vicksburg with General Joseph Hooker at Chancellorsville, or the reasons for Northern and Southern optimism in the spring of 1864. As a professor, Woodworth has learned the need to explain such vague terms as "political generals." This solid history is a useful guide for general readers and experts studying the Civil War during its 150th anniversary. Recommended. All levels/libraries. , Woodworth (history, Texas Christian Univ.; Manifest Destinies) displays his vast knowledge of Civil War military history in this sprightly march through the run-up to the war, the fighting, and the ware(tm)s immediate aftermath. He provides an unabashedly guns-and-battle account, emphasizing strategy and individual actions. . . . His descriptions of the generals and their tactics are sure-handed, and his command of action complete and compelling. In few words but telling detail, he makes astute observations about the character and conduct of military men and about the dynamics and direction of military thought. . . . His book will provide an excellent account for anyone wanting to know how the war was fought. Recommended for Civil War buffs and as a course text., Praise for Steven Woodworth's Manifest Destinies: America's Westward Expansion and the Road to the Civil War: "This is narrative history writ large and vigorously--with foreshadowings of tragedy.", [Woodworth] shows clearly how the war in the West "Grant "s and Sherman "s war "was the decisive factor, rather than the stalemate in the East. He also demonstrates how the South "s unrelenting campaign to maintain white supremacy "the felicitous phrase is 'not quite open war, but not quite peace' "outlasted a tired North "s determination to fully end the realities of slavery., Steven Woodworth offers a distillation of current scholarship in readable form which can easily be grasped by readers coming to the subject for the first time. In exploring the nature of the war and its overall significance, he at once dismisses the notion that the war was a e~futilee(tm) waste, an accusation that echoes the language of British critics of the Western Front 1914e"18 and reflects vastly different perspectives from the pre-Vietnam triumphalism of 1961e"65. The Civil War e~was worth fightinge(tm), Woodworth declares forthrightly. More than that, it is e~worth studying because of what was at stake ... because of how the war changed Americae(tm) and because e~of the height to which that generation of Americans rose and its challenge to future generations to be worthy of a free governmente(tm) (p. xiii). This passage reveals the influence of the popular notion which holds that specific generations evince a particular moral character., Steven Woodworth offers a distillation of current scholarship in readable form which can easily be grasped by readers coming to the subject for the first time. In exploring the nature of the war and its overall significance, he at once dismisses the notion that the war was a 'futile' waste, an accusation that echoes the language of British critics of the Western Front 1914-18 and reflects vastly different perspectives from the pre-Vietnam triumphalism of 1961-65. The Civil War 'was worth fighting', Woodworth declares forthrightly. More than that, it is 'worth studying because of what was at stake ... because of how the war changed America' and because 'of the height to which that generation of Americans rose and its challenge to future generations to be worthy of a free government' (p. xiii). This passage reveals the influence of the popular notion which holds that specific generations evince a particular moral character., Woodworth (history, Texas Christian Univ.; Manifest Destinies) displays his vast knowledge of Civil War military history in this sprightly march through the run-up to the war, the fighting, and the war's immediate aftermath. He provides an unabashedly guns-and-battle account, emphasizing strategy and individual actions. . . . His descriptions of the generals and their tactics are sure-handed, and his command of action complete and compelling. In few words but telling detail, he makes astute observations about the character and conduct of military men and about the dynamics and direction of military thought. . . . His book will provide an excellent account for anyone wanting to know how the war was fought. Recommended for Civil War buffs and as a course text.
